|
The National Post Ghost Stories in Cyberspaceby Kimberly Castro and Howard
Fienberg Have you heard about the recent One tells of a The Birmingham News recently wrote that U.S. Congressman
Fred Upton said more people are contacting his office about the Internet tax "than
on any other subject -- more than abortion, more than Elian, more than gas
prices." But 602P was merely concocted from someone's imagination.
The New York Times reported that the House of Representatives tried to quell
the long-lasting rumours by endorsing a bill
prohibiting the Federal Communications Commission from imposing Internet
fees. Rep. John Dingell said: "I only hope that the passage
of [the Internet Access Charge Prohibition Act] will finally extinguish this cybermyth once and for all." Meanwhile, a second e-mail warns of the "Klingerman Virus," which arrives in a large blue
envelope in your mailbox and reads on the front in bold black letters,
"A gift for you from the Klingerman Foundation."
Inside is a small sponge sealed in plastic carrying the unknown strain of
virus. According to the e-mail, seven out of the 23 people who came in
contact with the Klingerman virus died. How did the story start? The Associated Press referred to
the virus in a story of a After wrapping the letter in a plastic grocery bag, the
woman called 911, in turn bringing the bomb squad, the Palm Beach County
Sheriff's deputies, a hazardous materials team and a postal inspector to her home
to examine the envelope. But there was no virus. After receiving a flood of
phone calls, the CDC sent out a press release stating: "There is no 'Klingerman virus' and the information in the e-mail notice
is untrue. If you receive an e-mail message about the 'Klingerman
virus,' please do not forward [it] to others." On the Internet, immediacy is king and authority is hard
to come by. The freshest piece of misleading information disseminates to
thousands upon thousands, creating a flood of unnecessary worries. More importantly,
the Internet lacks an authority and worried users are often unable to
identify an authoritative figure over the Internet. Users do not hesitate to
read and forward alarmist e-mails from friends or family members. It may be
the case that while the sender honestly believed what he forwarded, he could
have easily been scammed himself. Internet users should take it upon themselves to check the
information they read. The e-mail alerts described above are examples of
Internet hoaxes intended for a few laughs. They demonstrate just how quickly rumours spread like wildfire via the Internet.
Unfortunately, these "harmless" pranks have harmful effects when,
mistaken for truth, they end up taking precedence over issues of real life
importance. Congress and the CDC have more pressing concerns to address than
thousands of imaginary problems sparked by a couple of e-mail pranks. And so
do you. return to Howard Fienberg's page |